Skip to Content

In the Shadow of the Productivity Frontier

It’s Feed the Future week highlighting the US Government’s efforts to #EndHunger around the world. As part of this global food security initiative, the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Assets and Market Access (AMA Innovation Lab) is proud to contribute to this growing body of research working to end poverty and hunger. 

“In the Shadow of the Productivity Frontier” 

Increasing agricultural productivity through technological advancement is key to increasing food security. We have heard this many times within the development community, and this is very true. 

Our innovative partnership with CIMMYT using DT Maize showcases the importance of drought tolerant (DT) seeds, for example. The positive productivity effects of specially formulated hybrid seeds and fertilizers are clearly evidenced in a series of AMA Innovation Lab research projects bridging Mexico, Kenya, and Tanzania. 

However – and this is a big one – ending hunger is not only about the newest, best technologies pushing out the agricultural productivity frontier. The most state-of-the-art inputs, devices and methods will have only minimal impact on food security if smallholder farmers can not or will not adopt it. 

There is a real gap between the yields that are technically possible and what is typically achieved by smallholder farmers in the developing world. To close this yield gap, researchers, policymakers and practitioners must prioritize shining light on that darkness hovering under the productivity frontier.  

“The AMA Innovation Lab has been working with researchers around the world to identify the barriers and test solutions to make sure farmers are actually adopting these technologies,” says Tara Steinmetz, assistant director of AMA Innovation Lab. 

 “Science and social science have to innovate together to help farmers achieve what is possible and end hunger.” 

The AMA Innovation Lab has a portfolio of research projects dedicated to casting light on the barriers that prevent farmers from adopting new technologies, and to designing solutions to overcome these barriers. 

One powerful deterrent to technology adoption is risk. Given the inherent risk in agriculture as a livelihood, farmers often hesitate to adopt personally untested inputs or technologies, especially if trying them requires taking on additional risk through a loan. In a recent Agrilinks blog highlighting several AMA Innovation lab projects, Jennifer Cissé, senior risk advisor for the Bureau for Food Security, lays out some of the production risks farmers face and underscores why mitigating this risk will embolden these smallholders to give new innovations a chance. 

“While these agricultural technologies and practices are critical to improving resilience by helping farmers mitigate production risk and increase productivity, there are many other strategies that can help farmers to mitigate and cope with production risk,” Cissé writes. 

A newer understanding of how to close the yield gap also highlights the importance to behavioral or educational factors. For example, the trust of a community needs to be earned before new, unfamiliar seeds and fertilizers, planting methods, or financial tools will be accepted and adopted. Social networks, information pathways, and their possible gaps needs to be better understood to capitalize on early adopters, or the spillover effects of information sharing. 

The yield gap can be particularly difficult to shift when new innovations do not actually benefit farmers. Specific soil and climate conditions, lack of access to markets and unprofitable high input prices, all hinder a farmer’s ability to try out or truly take advantage of advancements in technology. Making sure technologies can be tailored to take into consideration agro-ecological differences,or adapting new mechanisms for smallholders to collectively capture economies of scale, to navigate local commercial systems and to remain a part of the value chain will help to relax constraints and allow the yield gap to close further. 

The incorporation of the social sciences into a food security research strategy is essential to ensure that the investments in technology translate into farmer benefits.

Working together towards understanding what constraints fundamentally prevent farmers from adopting productive technologies that already exist will boost yields, contribute to self-sufficiency, resiliency, and ultimately make a difference to what food ends up on the family table. 

For more information on the broad portfolio of social science research the AMA Innovation Lab is conducting to build resilience and further food security around the world, please visit our website: basis.ucdavis.edu

 

Related Stories

Taking Action for Women in Agrifood Systems

Women have always worked in agrifood systems, but these systems have not always worked for women. That’s because barriers have stood in their way, preventing them from making their fullest contributions. Last year, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) “Status of Women in Agrifood Systems” report showed us just how slow progress has been in closing the gender gap in agriculture over the past decade. Their access to irrigation, livestock, land ownership and extension services has barely budged over the past decade. Also, they are facing these challenges at a time of immense global shocks.

Read More

Keep Up With Feed The Future